This is the first post in a new mini-series on RQ–RH–D–M across fields. The purpose of the series is to give readers a compact, practical toolkit showing how research questions (RQ), research hypotheses (RH) or working propositions, data (D), and methodology (M) can be aligned in different disciplines and under different research designs.
Education is an ideal field for starting this series because it naturally includes quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods research. Researchers in education often work with achievement data, classroom processes, institutional structures, policy change, inclusion, identity, and experience. That makes education especially useful for seeing how the same substantive problem can be framed differently depending on the design and the type of evidence available.
Education – quantitative research
Descriptive questions
-
RQ: What is the average mathematics achievement score of 8th-grade students in urban public schools?
RH: The average mathematics score of 8th-grade students in urban public schools is below the national benchmark.
D: Mathematics test score (continuous/scale); school location (categorical: urban); school type (categorical: public); grade level (ordinal/category: 8th grade).
M: Descriptive statistics, one-sample t-test against benchmark, confidence intervals, weighted mean if survey design is used.
-
RQ: What is the average mathematics achievement score of 8th-grade students in urban public schools?
RH: The average mathematics score of 8th-grade students in urban public schools is below the national benchmark.
D: Mathematics test score (continuous/scale); school location (categorical: urban); school type (categorical: public); grade level (ordinal/category: 8th grade).
M: Descriptive statistics, one-sample t-test against benchmark, confidence intervals, weighted mean if survey design is used.
-
RQ: What proportion of first-year university students report moderate or high academic stress during the first semester?
RH: More than half of first-year university students report moderate or high academic stress during the first semester.
D: Academic stress score/category (ordinal or scale, later categorized); year of study (categorical); semester (categorical/time marker).
M: Frequencies, proportions, binomial test, confidence intervals, survey-weighted estimation where relevant.
-
RQ: To what extent do secondary school teachers participate in formal professional development activities each academic year?
-
RH: Secondary school teachers participate in fewer than three formal professional development activities per academic year on average.
-
D: Number of professional development activities (count); school level (categorical: secondary); academic year (time marker).
-
M: Descriptive statistics, Poisson/negative binomial summary models, one-sample tests, distribution plots.
-
RQ: What is the average weekly time spent on homework by 6th-grade students in bilingual primary schools?
RH: 6th-grade students in bilingual primary schools spend more than 5 hours per week on homework on average.
D: Weekly homework hours (ratio/continuous); grade level (categorical); school type (categorical: bilingual primary).
M: Descriptive statistics, one-sample t-test or Wilcoxon signed-rank test, confidence intervals.
Comparative questions
-
RQ: Do students from urban and rural schools differ in standardized mathematics scores?
RH: Students from urban schools score higher on standardized mathematics tests than students from rural schools.
D: Mathematics score (continuous); school location (categorical: urban/rural).
M: Independent-samples t-test, Mann–Whitney U test, OLS regression with group indicator, ANCOVA if controls are added.
-
RQ: Do first-year students enrolled in fully online introductory statistics courses differ from students in face-to-face sections in final exam scores?
RH: Students in face-to-face sections achieve higher final exam scores than students in fully online sections.
D: Final exam score (continuous); course format (categorical: online/face-to-face); course section (categorical).
M: Independent-samples t-test, ANCOVA, multilevel model if students are nested in sections, propensity score adjustment as alternative.
-
RQ: Are school attendance rates different between students receiving free school meals and those not receiving them?
-
RH: Students receiving free school meals have lower attendance rates than students not receiving them.D: Attendance rate (percentage/continuous); free meal status (binary); school/class identifiers (categorical).
-
M: t-test, Mann–Whitney U test, OLS/beta regression, multilevel regression if clustered by school.
-
RQ: Do novice and experienced teachers differ in self-efficacy for classroom management?
-
RH: Experienced teachers report higher classroom-management self-efficacy than novice teachers.
-
D: Teacher self-efficacy scale (continuous/scale); experience group (categorical: novice/experienced).
-
M: t-test, ANOVA, OLS regression, ordinal models if scale is categorized.
Relational / correlational questions
-
RQ: Is student absenteeism associated with lower reading achievement in lower secondary education?
-
RH: Higher absenteeism is associated with lower reading achievement in lower secondary education.
-
D: Absenteeism days (count); reading score (continuous); grade level (categorical); school ID (categorical).
-
M: Pearson/Spearman correlation, OLS regression, multilevel regression, count-adjusted models if needed.
-
RQ: Is time spent on homework associated with science achievement among 10th-grade students?
-
RH: Weekly homework time is positively associated with science achievement up to a moderate level.
-
D: Homework hours (continuous); science score (continuous); grade (categorical).
-
M: Correlation, OLS regression, polynomial regression for nonlinearity, GAM as alternative.
-
RQ: Is teacher burnout associated with lower perceived classroom climate?
-
RH: Higher teacher burnout is associated with poorer perceived classroom climate.
-
D: Burnout score (continuous/scale); classroom climate score (continuous/scale); school ID (categorical).
-
M: Correlation, OLS regression, SEM as alternative, multilevel model if climate is aggregated by class.
-
RQ: Is parental educational attainment associated with students’ university aspirations in upper secondary school?
-
RH: Higher parental educational attainment is associated with higher odds of university aspirations among students.
-
D: Parental education level (ordinal); student aspiration to attend university (binary/ordinal); school type (categorical).
-
M: Logistic regression, ordinal logistic regression, chi-square test, SEM/path analysis as alternative.
Causal / experimental-style questions
-
RQ: What is the effect of a 6-week peer tutoring intervention on reading comprehension among 5th-grade students compared with a control group?
-
RH: Students in the peer tutoring group will show greater improvement in reading comprehension than students in the control group after 6 weeks.
-
D: Group assignment (binary); reading comprehension pre-test and post-test scores (continuous); student ID (categorical).
-
M: Mixed-model ANOVA, linear mixed-effects model, ANCOVA with post-test as outcome and pre-test as covariate.
-
RQ: Does providing weekly formative feedback improve essay-writing scores in secondary school English classes?
RH: Students receiving weekly formative feedback will achieve higher essay-writing scores than students receiving standard feedback.
D: Feedback condition (binary/categorical); essay score (continuous); repeated submissions if available (longitudinal continuous).
M: Randomized experiment, ANCOVA, linear mixed model, difference-in-differences if quasi-experimental.
-
RQ: What is the effect of reduced class size on early numeracy outcomes in Grade 1?
-
RH: Grade 1 students in reduced-size classes will achieve higher numeracy scores than students in standard-size classes.
-
D: Class size condition (binary/categorical); numeracy score (continuous); school/class IDs (categorical).
-
M: Cluster randomized trial analysis, multilevel modeling, ANCOVA, regression discontinuity if assignment threshold exists.
-
RQ: Does a teacher coaching program improve classroom observation ratings over one semester?
-
RH: Teachers participating in the coaching program will show greater gains in classroom observation ratings than non-participating teachers.
-
D: Coaching participation (binary); observation rating at baseline and follow-up (continuous/ordinal); teacher ID (categorical).
-
M: Linear mixed-effects model, mixed ANOVA, ordinal mixed model, difference-in-differences as alternative.
Education – qualitative research
Teaching and classroom practice
-
RQ: How do secondary mathematics teachers describe their decision-making when adapting instruction during mixed-ability lessons?
WP / RH: Teachers are likely to describe instructional adaptation as a balance between curriculum pacing, classroom management, and perceived student readiness.
D: In-depth interviews, lesson observations, teaching materials, reflective notes; key dimensions: adaptation, pacing, differentiation.
M: Thematic analysis, qualitative content analysis, classroom ethnography, constant comparative coding.
-
RQ: How do primary school teachers make sense of student participation during inquiry-based science lessons?
WP / RH: Teachers are likely to interpret participation not only as verbal contribution but also as attentiveness, collaboration, and task engagement.
D: Semi-structured interviews, classroom observations, field notes, video-recorded lessons.
M: Thematic analysis, discourse-informed analysis, ethnographic observation, framework analysis.
-
RQ: How do university lecturers describe the challenges of maintaining interaction in large online classes?
WP / RH: Lecturers are likely to describe interaction as constrained by scale, technology, and uncertainty about student presence.
D: Lecturer interviews, course recordings, chat transcripts, teaching reflections.
M: Reflexive thematic analysis, qualitative case study, discourse analysis, document-supported interview analysis.
Student learning and experience
-
RQ: How do first-generation university students make sense of belonging during their first year on campus?
WP / RH: First-generation students are likely to describe belonging as shaped by everyday recognition, peer support, and institutional readability.
D: Student interviews, diaries, reflective journals, orientation materials; key dimensions: belonging, recognition, support.
M: Phenomenological analysis, thematic analysis, narrative inquiry, interpretative phenomenological analysis.
-
RQ: How do upper secondary students describe the experience of preparing for high-stakes examinations?
WP / RH: Students are likely to describe exam preparation as combining pressure, routine, uncertainty, and strategic adaptation.
D: Interviews, student diaries, revision plans, school guidance documents.
M: Thematic analysis, narrative analysis, qualitative content analysis, case-oriented coding.
-
RQ: How do students in fully online degree programs describe academic confidence during their first semester?
WP / RH: Students are likely to describe academic confidence as shaped by feedback timing, self-regulation, and visibility of progress.
D: Interviews, discussion-board posts, reflective journals, learning-platform interaction records used qualitatively.
M: Thematic analysis, phenomenological analysis, virtual ethnography, narrative inquiry.
Inclusion, equity, and belonging
-
RQ: How do students with disabilities describe classroom inclusion in mainstream secondary schools?
WP / RH: Students are likely to describe inclusion as dependent on everyday accommodations, peer response, and teacher flexibility rather than policy language alone.
D: Student interviews, support plans, classroom observations, school inclusion policies.
M: Thematic analysis, case study, inclusive education case comparison, document-assisted qualitative analysis.
-
RQ: How do migrant-background students interpret language support practices in primary education?
WP / RH: Students are likely to describe language support as unevenly experienced depending on teacher sensitivity, peer interaction, and classroom routines.
D: Interviews, classroom observations, language-support materials, parent communication documents.
M: Thematic analysis, ethnographic observation, discourse analysis, comparative case study.
-
RQ: How do students from low-income households describe participation in school life beyond the classroom?
WP / RH: Students are likely to describe participation as shaped by hidden costs, social comparison, and selective access to extracurricular opportunities.
D: Interviews, school event materials, observation notes, student narratives.
M: Thematic analysis, narrative inquiry, critical qualitative analysis, case study.
Policy, reform, and school culture
-
RQ: How do school leaders interpret the implementation of curriculum reform in lower secondary schools?
WP / RH: School leaders are likely to describe curriculum reform as filtered through accountability demands, staff capacity, and local school culture.
D: Leader interviews, policy documents, implementation plans, meeting notes.
M: Qualitative case study, thematic analysis, policy enactment analysis, document analysis.
-
RQ: How do teachers experience the introduction of data-driven accountability practices in their schools?
WP / RH: Teachers are likely to describe accountability practices as simultaneously clarifying expectations and narrowing professional autonomy.
D: Teacher interviews, internal school documents, observation of staff meetings, reflective statements.
M: Thematic analysis, critical policy analysis, institutional ethnography, framework analysis.
-
RQ: How do students perceive changes in school culture after the introduction of restorative discipline policies?
WP / RH: Students are likely to describe school culture as changing through relationships and consistency of practice rather than policy wording alone.
D: Student focus groups, interviews, behavior-policy documents, observation notes.
M: Thematic analysis, focus group analysis, qualitative case study, comparative school case analysis.
Professional development and teacher identity
-
RQ: How do novice teachers describe the transition from teacher education to full classroom responsibility?
WP / RH: Novice teachers are likely to describe the transition as a shift from instructional idealism to negotiated professional survival.
D: Interviews, induction journals, mentoring records, classroom reflections.
M: Narrative inquiry, thematic analysis, phenomenological analysis, longitudinal qualitative case study.
-
RQ: How do experienced teachers interpret professional development programs focused on digital pedagogy?
WP / RH: Experienced teachers are likely to describe digital professional development through the lens of usefulness, credibility, and fit with established practice.
D: Interviews, workshop materials, teacher reflections, planning documents.
M: Thematic analysis, qualitative content analysis, case study, practitioner inquiry.
-
RQ: How do teachers in rural schools construct their professional identity in conditions of limited resources?
WP / RH: Teachers are likely to frame professional identity around adaptability, relational commitment, and local responsibility.
D: Interviews, reflective journals, school community documents, observation notes.
M: Narrative inquiry, thematic analysis, ethnographic case study, discourse-oriented qualitative analysis.
Education – mixed methods
Achievement gaps and learning conditions
-
RQ: How do differences in home study resources relate to mathematics achievement among lower secondary students, and how do students describe the role of those resources in their learning?
RH / WP: Students with fewer home study resources will show lower mathematics achievement; students are likely to describe learning conditions through access, quiet space, and family support; qualitative accounts are expected to clarify how resource constraints translate into achievement gaps.
D: Quantitative: mathematics scores, home resource index, SES indicators; Qualitative: student interviews or focus groups on study routines and home learning conditions.
M: Convergent mixed methods design, regression/SEM plus thematic analysis, joint display integration, comparative subgroup interpretation.
-
RQ: What is the relationship between peer integration and first-year belonging scores, and how do students explain that relationship in their everyday campus experience?
RH / WP: Lower peer integration will be associated with lower belonging scores; students are likely to narrate belonging through everyday recognition and informal support; qualitative findings are expected to explain variation in belonging scores across similar profiles.
D: Quantitative: belonging scale, peer network measures, demographic variables; Qualitative: interviews, diaries, orientation reflections.
M: Explanatory sequential design, regression or network-informed analysis plus thematic analysis, integrated interpretation through joint displays.
Teaching innovation and classroom change
-
RQ: What effect does a flipped-classroom intervention have on science achievement, and how do teachers and students describe the instructional changes associated with it?
RH / WP: Students in flipped classrooms will show higher science achievement; teachers and students are likely to describe changes in pacing, preparation, and participation; qualitative findings are expected to explain why some classrooms benefit more than others.
D: Quantitative: pre/post science scores, intervention status, attendance; Qualitative: teacher interviews, student focus groups, classroom observations.
M: Explanatory sequential or embedded mixed methods design, ANCOVA/mixed-effects model plus thematic analysis, observation-informed integration.
-
RQ: How does weekly formative feedback influence essay-writing performance, and how do students interpret the usefulness of that feedback during the semester?
RH / WP: Students receiving weekly formative feedback will improve more in essay scores; students are likely to describe usefulness through clarity, timing, and actionability; integration is expected to show which features of feedback align with larger performance gains.
D: Quantitative: repeated essay scores, feedback condition, rubric dimensions; Qualitative: interviews, feedback logs, reflective notes.
M: Embedded or explanatory sequential mixed methods design, linear mixed model plus thematic analysis, matrix-based integration.
Policy, inclusion, and school experience
-
RQ: How are school attendance patterns associated with free school meal participation, and how do students and staff describe the barriers behind those patterns?
RH / WP: Students receiving free school meals will have lower attendance on average; participants are likely to describe attendance barriers through transport, family strain, stigma, and routine disruption; integration is expected to explain how structural barriers shape the statistical pattern.
D: Quantitative: attendance rate, free meal status, grade, school ID; Qualitative: interviews with students and staff, school welfare records, observational notes.
M: Explanatory sequential design, multilevel regression plus thematic analysis, joint display and case-based integration.
-
RQ: What differences exist in inclusion survey scores between students with and without disabilities, and how do students describe the everyday meaning of inclusion in mainstream classrooms?
RH / WP: Students with disabilities will report lower inclusion scores; students are likely to define inclusion through accommodation, recognition, and participation; qualitative findings are expected to refine interpretation of score differences and reveal hidden mechanisms.
D: Quantitative: inclusion scale scores, disability status, classroom/school variables; Qualitative: interviews, observations, support-plan documents.
M: Convergent mixed methods design, group comparison models plus thematic/case analysis, integrated interpretation using merged displays.